DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 5. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JSR
Docket No: NR5591-14
0
19 September 2 14
Dear Master sergeant Je
This is in reference to your application For correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
BR three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 18 September 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. Tn addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps dated 13 June
2014, a copy of which is attached, and your Yetter dated 15
September 2014.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion,
noting that you did not provide a copy of the investigation
which, you allege, did not find the sexual harassment
allegations against you to be substantiated. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by |
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O'NETLL
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3782 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support therecf and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11369 14
The page 11 entry was not considered, as the attached e-mail dated 28 October 2014 from Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) shows that neither the entry nor your rebuttal appears in your Official Military Personnel File. A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its gecision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5207 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your — application on 18 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3401 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0832 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the office of the Chief of Naval Operations dated 6 June 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2101 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NSSC letter 4050 Ser 142/079 dated 6 May 2014, 4 copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden 1s on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3277 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1336 RCT dated 16 July 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1841 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on >6 June 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 15 May 2014, a copy of which is attached, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8674 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2014. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 7200 RFF-11 dated 7 August 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1038 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo dated 30 July 2014, a copy of which is attached.